When scientific institutions withhold empirical data in order to promote a single belief system they can manipulate a trusting public into believing whatever paradigm they wish to impose upon them.Those who trust the institutions but do not investigate the evidence themselves are easily prodded along. Go beyond what you read on blogs or watch on standard science programs and be prepared to question what you have long been taught regarding the peopling of the Americas. However, much of the data on the archaeological Click on the link or the picture for Virginia Steen-Mc Intyre's Pleistocene Coalition page and quick information on Valsequillo and Hueyatlaco.) Steen-Mc Intyre is a founding member of the Pleistocene Coalition and editor and advisor for or Neanderthals as just barely intelligent enough to walk around or throw a few spears?
Dating techniques in archaeology pdf
Johanessen began research into the domestication of plants and animals in Central America followed by investigations in the Himalayan region of Asia which were funded by grants from the National Science Foundation.
Noticing the similarity of crops such as corn, beans, and squash which had not been observed before, Johannessen began to postulate thatcontact between the hemispheres and that sculptures depicting corn in East Indian temples, for example, that Johannessen provided as evidence could not possibly depict corn (See images at right and develop your own opinion).
If you are prepared to think in 3D and enter into the spiritual and philosophical minds of early people, then it is time to look beyond the mundane interpretations of artifacts so long promoted by mainstream science and realize with confidence what you probably already intuitively knew - that never made it to the New World may tell you to steer clear of "fringe" ideas.
They often do whatever it takes to make certain that you, as a consumer of science, are left to know of only one perspective in regards how American archaeological sites are dated and when early peoples first appeared in the Americas.
Unlike in other fields of science, and due to the less-rigorous nature and weaknesses of its tenets, this community routinely blocks from publication any evidence that challenges its core paradigms resulting in public perceptions that are not accurate. Learn how this data (held back since 2006) demonstrates beyond any doubt that there has been no change in human cognitive ability for at least 400,000 years, challenging the veracity of the evolutionary paradigm in a way never anticipated and leaving the only strategic response from the faith-based Darwin community that of low, though standard evolutionary community, behaviors such as name-calling (see expos below) or simply ignoring or censoring the evidence.
On this page ( challenging a paradigm and presented in a mainstream forum was held back from publication by the European, Australian, and U. (John Feliks) If you are absolutely convinced that people first arrived in the Americas a mere 15-30 thousand years ago, this is because you have been spoon-fed by an institution that will not allow you to see conflicting data.
Also influencing Mc Cormack's approach to archaeology is a strong background in music.
She is currently studying Paulette Steeves is a Graduate student and Ph D candidate at Binghamton University, New York, under the Clifford D.
As a response, more and more people have joined together to form discussion groups to weigh out the evidence for themselves, express doubts, and or philosophies.
What matters, and what skeptics should pay attention to, is that these groups have mounting empirical reasons to doubt the veracity and objectivity of what is presented to them as fact by mainstream science.
These ghostly images carried with them spiritual, philosophical, and aesthetic implications." Archaeological evidence for earlier contact than promoted by the mainstream science and historical communities includes appearance of new food crops, animals, calendars, religious practices, medical procedures, genetics, etc. D, Professor Emeritus at Brigham Young University, Dept. They are co-authors of the ground-breaking book, was rejected for publication by mainstream presses and university presses alike.